Re: New Rose beds

---

• To: r*@eskimo.com
• Subject: Re: New Rose beds
• From: r*@reach.net
• Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 10:29:11 -0400
• In-Reply-To: <199805261835.LAA17497@brutus.transport.com>
• Resent-Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 07:27:17 -0700
• Resent-From: rose-list@eskimo.com
• Resent-Message-ID: <"Zk2Dy1.0.Aq1.4B2Rr"@mx1>
• Resent-Sender: rose-list-request@eskimo.com

At 11:33 AM 5/26/98 -0700, you wrote:
>I have never heard that. I can't image why. 
>Anyone have a clue ? 
>Perhaps because of settling of new soil.
>Guess I could have waited for the rain to
>press it down... Not...

I have heard however, that you shouldn't plant roses in old beds where
roses have grown before.  This is due to the fact that roses are very heavy
feeders, and the soil would be depleated of vital nutrients.

Caroline

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: New Rose beds
    • From: p* (* H*

• References:
  • New Rose beds
    • From: "rosenlund" <rosenlund@transport.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: Miniature Roses/Catalog list & Comments
• Next by Date: Re: Interesting Black spot treatment
• Prev by thread: Re: New Rose beds
• Next by thread: Re: New Rose beds