This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Digest and other things
- To: r*@eskimo.com
- Subject: Re: Digest and other things
- From: A* R* <a*@austx.tandem.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 11:49:46 -0500 (CDT)
- In-Reply-To: <E1B236602CA5D011B7CF00805FFE9ADE324C73@xch-sea-08.ca.boeing.com> from "McAlpine, Duncan G" at Sep 2, 97 05:59:57 am
- Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 09:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: rose-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"PwLoG3.0.U6.vK43q"@mx2>
- Resent-Sender: rose-list-request@eskimo.com
> Simple question: Are there roses without thorns? What are they? Is it a
> certain species or hybrid?
> Duncan McAlpine
I do not know whether the tendency to have few thorns is confined to a
species or class of roses. The famous Zephyrine Drouhin is thornless;
Veilchenblau is nearly thornless, with only the newer growth having any
thorns and the canes very smooth, almost bamboo like. Both of these are
sprawlers / climbers, so there may be some relationship there. Z. D.
is a Bourbon; V. I cannot remember. They are both spring once-bloomers
(old garden roses).
--
Amy Moseley Rupp
amyr@austx.tandem.com, Austin, TX, USDA zone 8b, Sunset zone 30
Jill O. *Trades, Mistress O. {} busy bee as proponent for:
ftp://www.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/misc/misc.kids.moderated
References:
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index