Re: Efficient SF crops
- To: S*@LISTS.UMSL.EDU
- Subject: Re: Efficient SF crops
- From: J* W* <j*@idsonline.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 21:05:47 -0500
"thyme" is doing lots of different stuff from me, and I'm not practicing strict Square Footedness, but I can certainly identify with her statement that her "bell peppers were NOT impressive!" Same here in USDA zone 7 just outside the Nation's Capital. I have yet to read a word from anybody here or over on the Usenet side saying that this was a good year for sweet peppers. Wonder what went wrong nationwide??? My California Wonders, Yellow California Wonder's, Park's Rainbox Mix, and Park's China Belles were all misshapen and thin walled. Actually, I've *never* had peppers with walls thick like at the grocery store. But I had bangup pepper crops in all colors in 1994, so it *can* be done fine in this climate. thyme talks about "gypsy peppers." What are they? My tomatoes all did well. I'm confused why thyme would want to use determinate toms next year. Isn't it better to keep getting fruit over the long haul from a vine? Caging worked out fine in my raised beds; toms left to sprawl were messy. I don't prune tomatoes at all, BTW. Spinach was my surprise success story. Both 'Tyee' and 'Melody' did very well for me despite seed not being into the ground until April 23. We had a long, cold, very wet spring here with frost in the first week of May (quite unusual). --Janet ------------------------------------------------------------------ Janet Wintermute jwintermute@idsonline.com
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Efficient SF crops
- From: John Orwick <oldjohn@JUNO.COM>
- Re: Efficient SF crops
- From: John Gingras <gingrasj@pilot.msu.edu>
- Prev by Date: Re: Raised Beds
- Next by Date: Re: fungus and tomato disease
- Prev by thread: Re[2]: Efficient SF crops
- Next by thread: Re: Efficient SF crops