hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: hairy seedling - Bob

  • Subject: Re: [iris-photos] hairy seedling - Bob
  • From: "Margie Valenzuela" <IrisLady@comcast.net>
  • Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:10:36 -0700

Hi Bob,  No intrusion at all.   Hearing from more than one person is always advantageous!  I hope you always choose to do so.
Margie V.
Oro Valley, AZ.
Zone 8/9
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 6:26 AM
Subject: Re: [iris-photos] hairy seedling

 Margie & Donald; Sorry to intrude on your discussion, but I wanted to agree with Donald that it is not how many buds a plant has, but how floriferous it is and how it presents its flowers. Too many judges don't understand this and rely on counting buds. This cook book technique "may" be okay for judging tall-beardeds, but judging by a recipe is really poor judging. Sometimes I would like to scream when somebody is counting buds and say just observe the clunp for a week and see what it really does.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
click here

Yahoo! Groups Links

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement