----- Original Message -----
From:
P*@hotmail.com
To: i*@egroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 4:36 AM
Subject: Re: [iris-photos] to be or not
to be
Ok, here is a subject that is very
controversial: haft veining.
I know some of the old-time hybridizers
have worked long and hard to remove them from the flower, and now prefer clean
color throughout the haft area.
However, I feel many have lost sight of
the fact that haft veining can add distinction and a gradual color separation
to a flower in certain cases.
In this case, I feel the flower would
loose something if those haft veins were not there. The veining adds to
the flower in my opinion. See for yourself in the attached
picture. I have colored in the haft area and do not think it
is as nice looking a flower as the one
with veins.
IMHO, I love the flower as is. It is
the "The branching is tight.
Buds are adequate to good." part that bothers me. Don't we want
more introductions that have better branching with buds that are above
"good," rather than another pretty flower?
Patrick Orr
Phoenix, AZ USA
Zone 9
I can just hear Mike now getting ready to
pick apart any future seedlings I might possibly introduce...lol
----- Original Message -----
From:
h*@directcon.net
To: i*@egroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 1:32
PM
Subject: Re: [iris-photos] to be or not
to be
Of course you can see a lot more than we can on
our monitors. However I would not recommend introduction because of the haft
veining. There were several earlier blue amoena "to be or not to be" photos
that I thought were much better.
I did receive your catalog
today.
----- Original Message -----
From:
s*@lightspeed.net
To: i*@egroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 8:13
AM
Subject: [iris-photos] to be or not
to be
Need some help. I really like the color and form of this
flower. The branching is tight. Buds are adequate to
good. What do you all think of it? Should it be intro'd or
not?
Thanks
Mike