Re: Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?

To: i*@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [iris-species] Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
From: "David Ferguson" m*@msn.com
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:28:19 -0600
References: 7569BCB6.37204768.4D7C6017@netscape.net
Seal-send-time: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:28:19 -0600

Hadn't read Chuck's comments on parentage of cengialtii based on the Iris Chronicles No. 12 when I sent the last post. I guess my question to Laetitia is answered.

On the flip side, it still doesn't say that 'Tid-bit' is not referable to cengialtii, it even implies by association that it might be. Pretty weak evidence, but still not a negative.

Dave

Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iris-species/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: iris-species-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

References:
- RE: Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
  - From: i*

Prev by Date: Re: Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
Next by Date: Re: Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
Previous by thread: RE: Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
Next by thread: Re: Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index