Re: Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
- To: i*@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-species] Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
- From: "David Ferguson" m*@msn.com
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:24:14 -0600
- References: BAY103-F1364BD3DA72E9DA10ECEE6A5340@phx.gbl
- Seal-send-time: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:24:14 -0600
Laetitia wrote:
"TID-BIT is registered with the parentage of
cengialti x pallida. Which means its only half cengialti." I'm curious, where did you find the
parentage? I couldn't find anything except a year and Sturtevant as the
introducer. Great information to have!
That parentage would indeed mean it is pure I.
pallida, though it would not be pure to subspecies. That is if you accept
that cengialtii is a subspecies of I. pallida.
Dave Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- References:
- RE: Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
- From: "s* 1*"
- From: "s* 1*"
- RE: Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: I. pallida cengialtii?
- Next by Date: Re: Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
- Previous by thread: RE: Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?
- Next by thread: RE: Re'Tid-bit' - I. pallida cengialtii?