Re: unidentified/ was brevicaulis (#4 of 4)

---

• To: <i*@yahoogroups.com>
• Subject: Re: [iris-species] unidentified/ was brevicaulis (#4 of 4)
• From: &* <h*@povn.net>
• Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 06:47:45 -0700
• References: <6.1.0.6.0.20040605174944.01b9ebd8@pop.bizland.com>

Dennis,

It wouldn't be out of line for some pseudacorus to reach only 24". I have
one growing at less than that now even though it has enough water and
nutrients.

Christy

Skip & Christy Hensler
THE ROCK GARDEN
Newport, WA
http://www.povn.com/rock/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dennis Kramb" <dkramb@badbear.com>

> There was one other iris that remains unidentified.  The leaves had a
> midrib, just like pseudacorus, but the leaves were only 2ft tall, on a
> clump at least 18" wide.  I have no idea what it could be.




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/2gGylB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iris-species/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     iris-species-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: unidentified/ was brevicaulis (#4 of 4)
    • From: J* C* &*

• References:
  • brevicaulis (#4 of 4)
    • From: D* K* &*

• Prev by Date: PHOTO: recent series from Cincinnati area
• Next by Date: Re: Iris ensata, again
• Previous by thread: brevicaulis (#4 of 4)
• Next by thread: Re: unidentified/ was brevicaulis (#4 of 4)