Re: unidentified/ was brevicaulis (#4 of 4)
- To: i*@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-species] unidentified/ was brevicaulis (#4 of 4)
- From: J* C* <j*@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 09:19:36 -0500
- References: <6.1.0.6.0.20040605174944.01b9ebd8@pop.bizland.com> <00cf01c44bcc$d8f28300$61812945@hppav>
There is a dwarf pseudacorus available--it doesn't want to grow for me--that wouldn't be any bigger than that. Joan Cooper, Roseville, MN Zone 4
Hensler wrote:
Dennis,
It wouldn't be out of line for some pseudacorus to reach only 24". I have
one growing at less than that now even though it has enough water and
nutrients.
Christy
Skip & Christy Hensler
THE ROCK GARDEN
Newport, WA
http://www.povn.com/rock/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dennis Kramb" d*@badbear.com
> There was one other iris that remains unidentified. The leaves had a
> midrib, just like pseudacorus, but the leaves were only 2ft tall, on a
> clump at least 18" wide. I have no idea what it could be.
- References:
- brevicaulis (#4 of 4)
- From: D* K* &*
- Re: unidentified/ was brevicaulis (#4 of 4)
- From: &* &*
- brevicaulis (#4 of 4)
- Prev by Date: Re: Iris ensata, again
- Next by Date: Re: PHOTO: recent series from Cincinnati area
- Previous by thread: Re: unidentified/ was brevicaulis (#4 of 4)
- Next by thread: PHOTO: recent series from Cincinnati area