Re: Iris pallida cultivars and nomenclatural question
- To: i*@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: [iris-species] Re: Iris pallida cultivars and nomenclatural question
- From: &* M* <n*@charter.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:47:57 -0000
--- In iris-species@yahoogroups.com, dferguson@c... wrote:
"..nomenclatural question...." [concerning *Iris pallida* forms, etc.]
Dave, first of all, let me make a disclaimer. I am by no means an
authority on nomenclature, but I have grown (and loved) several cv's
on your list.
"Squalens" as a term applies to blends and was actively in use in the
AIS registry through 1949; in fact, I suspect the translation from
the Latin would be "blend." I doubt it would be appropriate to apply
the term to all *pallida* x *variegata* hybrids.
Of those you list, I would say these are definitely *not* pallidas--
'La Neige' is a small white of flower form, plant character and
branching that is almost pure *Iris variegata* except for petal
texture and the gloss of the foliage which show its hybrid origin.
It is listed, incidentally, by Winterberry. What I had under that
name was one of the iris I have enjoyed as much as any. It has
elegant simplicity.
'No-we-ta' (the hyphens belong in the name) is a blend, more
*variegata* than *pallida* in character and proportions. It appears
to be quite an advanced generation hybrid with flower form and size
substantially different from either of the parent species.
'Pink Ruffles' is a seedling of 'No-we-ta' and has an almost
identical plant proportion and flower size. As the pollen parent was
close to *pallida* species type except in color--a lovely rose pink--
'Pink Ruffles' does have the *pallida* gloss and color in its
foliage, but like 'No-we-ta' is more *variegata* than *pallida* in my
estimation. It also looks emphatically like a very advanced
generation hybrid. In fact, I'd hazard an opinion that as diploids
go, 'Pink Ruffles' went about as far toward "modern" character as any
diploid. It also is rather late--about 1940.
I think I did grow 'Dogrose' briefly, and likewise 'Eros.' Both look
to be almost pure *pallida* in plant character if I recall rightly,
but I do not believe the pink or rose-pink color of each is typical
of the species. Someone having familiarity with wild populations of
presumably pure *pallida* clones could speak to that with some
authority. I cannot.
Your project is interesting. I should think the historians among us
would find your end results of considerable value.
Neil Mogensen zone 7 western NC mountains
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/2gGylB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iris-species/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
iris-species-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index