PHOTO: Digital Images
- To: "INTERNET:i*@egroups.com"
- Subject: PHOTO: Digital Images
- From: S* M* <7*@compuserve.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 23:02:05 -0400
Message text written by Dennis Kramb:
>
This makes a lot of sense. I never thought of that before. Although, I
still think focus has something to do with it, because sometimes ... on
rare occasions (like 1 out of 100) ... the photo turns out just right.
I think another part of the problem is that I never use a tripod, so
there's me shaking the camera, and the wind blowing the flowers around that
also contribute to "fuzzy" images.
<
Yes, focus and resolution are both factors. I was describing the effects
of differing resolutions when the focus IS correct. That "just right"
photo has everything: accurate focus, appropriate depth of field, AND the
correct resolution.
If the foreground fills the frame and the focus is set on infinity, the
highest possible resolution can't fix the fuzzy quality.
If the picture is in perfect focus and has the right depth of field, but
the resolution is too low -- same story.
Does this make more sense?
Sharon McAllister
73372.1745@compuserve.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good friends, school spirit, hair-dos you'd like to forget.
Classmates.com has them all. And with 4.4 million alumni already
registered, there's a good chance you'll find your friends here:
http://click.egroups.com/1/2885/0/_/486170/_/956372541/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
