Re: FEATURE ATTRACTION, ET.AL. PARENTAGE PUBLISHED
- To: Multiple recipients of list <i*@rt66.com>
- Subject: Re: FEATURE ATTRACTION, ET.AL. PARENTAGE PUBLISHED
- From: L*@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 09:24:33 -0700 (MST)
In a message dated 97-01-19 10:50:42 EST, you write:
Lloyd Zurbrigg said
>Parentages should be published. This is often a very good
>warning not to buy, on the one hand, - - and to be sure to buy on the other
>hand. There are exceptions, of course.
Lloyd, that is too cryptic for me this morning - could you explain a little
bit more what you mean? After reading these comments about unpublished
parentage, I was trying to look up parentage on some Schreiner intros and
most of them go to parents and grandparents identifed by seedling number,
which isn't any kind of clue for me. Are they being deliberately secretive?
I keep expecting a Schreiner family member to suddenly decloak and flame us
all...
Linda Mann lmann76543@aol.com east Tennessee USA
