Re: AIS: Symposium/soap box #9
- Subject: Re: AIS: Symposium/soap box #9
- From: w*@watervalley.net
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 12:48:40 -0500 (CDT)
From: kellydn@frontiernet.net
To: iris-talk@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:32:01 -0400
Subject: [iris-talk] Re: AIS: Symposium/soap box #9
>> A maybe
stupid question....but why were write-in votes done away with? Is it
because it was too much work to put together? Trusted it would be a lot of
work but I feel this gives non judge members a say in what they think should
be considered the best of the best. >>
This was answered recently. No write-in votes received a sufficient
number of votes to make it to the top 100.
There are twenty-four tabulators (each RVP) so it is not too much
work to count write-ins. It's just a fact there never were enough
to count, so why continue this exercise in futility?
<<Not all members wish to become judges. Some are true gardeners...people who
love to tend the Earth. It is there choice to not be a judge but that
doesn't mean they don't have a say. >>
So judges are not true gardeners, just a title?? Fooled me! It's
the same thing as saying a Master Gardener (which you list among
your credentials) is not a gardener either but just a title. Master
Gardener sounds like a title one earns from years of toiling in the
soil. Fooled me again!!
Walter Moores
Enid Lake, MS USA 7/8
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Will You Find True Love?
Will You Meet the One?
Free Love Reading by phone!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/7dY7FD/R_ZEAA/Ey.GAA/2gGylB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/