RE: OT: PBF Project -- RIP
- To: Multiple recipients of list <i*@rt66.com>
- Subject: RE: OT: PBF Project -- RIP
- From: M*@fin.gc.ca (Mark, Maureen)
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 17:56:21 -0600 (MDT)
I joined the list after I came back from the convention. I have no idea =
what project you are referring to. Is it still in the archives for me to =
look up and what should I search for, i.e., what does PBF stand for?
Maureen
mark.maureen@fin.g.c.ca
Ottawa (zone 4)
----------
From: Sharon McAllister
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: OT: PBF Project -- RIP
Date: Tuesday, July 08, 1997 6:30PM
Rita B wrote:
: It may be a bit early to pull the plug. =3D
Actually, I probably should have pulled the plug months ago -- but I was
hoping that the lack of submissions was due to procrastination rather tha=
=3D
n
disinterest.
: Perhaps with some preplanning,
: like get the idea into more heads a few months in advance and try agai=
=3D
n
: during the coming year- giving the people from the southern hemisphere=
=3D
an
: opportunity to participate as well. =3D
This year, we started discussing the project before bloom started in the
south and continued as bloom progressed northward. There was a lot of =3D
initial enthusiasm, but very few people actually got around to making the=3D
ir
observations and sending them in. =3D
I took the analysis far enough to determine that we are woefully short of=
=3D
enough data to detect a significant trend, either geographical or
chronological. I got only about 10% of the number of observations I
thought we'd need -- and most of them were clustered in the south and wes=
=3D
t.
This was just enough to show that my original estimate had been on the l=
=3D
ow
side, and convince me that there's no point in extending the project
another year.
If someone else wants to volunteer to crunch the data, though....
Sharon McAllister
73372.1745@compuser.come