Re: OT: judging
- Subject: Re: OT: judging
- From: M* M*
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 15:37:48 -0500
From: "Mark, Maureen" <MARKM@tc.gc.ca>
How does one learn the strengths and weaknesses of judges from a list? Is
it the responsibility of the RVP to know this and be a resource for those
who request judges from that area?
Maureen Mark
m*@ottawa.com
Ottawa, Canada (zone 4)
> ----------
> From: tomd@fones.cals.lib.ar.us[SMTP:tomd@fones.cals.lib.ar.us]
> Reply To: iris-talk@onelist.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 1999 11:17 AM
> To: iris-talk@onelist.com
> Subject: [iris-talk] Re: OT: judging and ethics
>
> From: tomd@fones.cals.lib.ar.us (Tom Dillard)
>
> Hi:
>
> It seems to me that it would be a good idea when assembling a judging
> panel
> to insure that at least one of the judges knows beardless irises...this
> would help address the issue of having a panel that is totally unfit. I
> have seen judges back off and defer to a more knowledgeable judge...and
> this is healthy if the judge being deferred to is really knowledgeable.
>
> This approach means that the person selecting the judges will need to keep
> a close eye on the lists of available judges...learn their strengths and
> weaknesses, etc.
>
> Tom
>
> Tom W. Dillard, Curator
> Butler Center for Arkansas Studies
> Central Arkansas Library System
> 100 Rock Street
> Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
> (501) 918-3054
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Did you know that we have over 85,000 e-mail communities at Onelist?
> http://www.onelist.com
> Come visit our new web site and explore a new interest
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come check out our brand new web site!
http://www.onelist.com
Onelist: Making the Internet intimate
