Re: OT: Broccoli Nutrition
- To: i*@egroups.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-talk] OT: Broccoli Nutrition
- From: w*@watervalley.net
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 08:11:48 -0500
- Priority: normal
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
Free @Backup service! Click here for your free trial of @Backup.
@Backup is the most convenient way to securely protect and access
your files online. Try it now and receive 300 MyPoints.
http://click.egroups.com/1/6348/0/_/486170/_/968936654/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
> -------------------------- eGroups Sponsor
> -------------------------~-~> 0% Introductory APR! Instant Approval!
> Aria Visa - get yours today.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/7102/0/_/486170/_/968906682/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------_
> ->
>
> Just an interesting little tidbit I just read...
>
> Since 1975, Broccoli has undergone a change in nutritional value.
>
> Calcium is down 53.4%
> Iron is down 20%
> Vitamin A is down 38.3%
> Vitamin C is down 17.5%
>
> I guess since it is not a good for you as everyone thought, I can now
> skip it! My thought has always been anything that tastes that bad
> couldn't possible be all that good for you...and now I have proof!
>
Maybe the broccoli you ate got too close to the Dursban!
Even with the diminished per cents above, it still has high values.
What about those little aborted ears of corn in the pickled food
section of the grocery store? There ought to be a law against
picking them before they are mature. Surely, they have no food
value.
Yes, we talked about Hollyhock Dolls already and a group in
Farmville . . .that will remain nameless.
Walter Moores
Enid Lake, MS 7/8 USA
>
>
