This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Hills
- To: Chris Andersen <c*@value.net>
- Subject: Re: Hills
- From: D* M* <m*@eskimo.com>
- Date: Sat, 08 Feb 1997 15:48:21 +0000
- References: <199702082250.OAA29494@value.net>
Chris Andersen wrote:
>
> PKINBUMKIN,
>
> I think you will get various answers on this one. In California we call
> hills Mountains. In the Sierra Nevada they range from 5,000 ft. to almost
> 14,000 ft. high! Don't know if there is any "correct" size.......!
> > From: PKINBUMKIN@aol.com
> >
> > Hi all. What is the correct size of a hill?
> > Thanks
I make my hills about 8" high and 3'x 3'w/l. You can see one of hills on
Dan's homepage with the photo's. I just reviewed his page and I think it
is gone. It showed George Brooks plot with his hill size. I found it:
http://www.athenet.net/~dang/OPP/brooks/mound/index.html
--
Duncan McAlpine, Federal Way, WA
Why buy plants when you can grow them yourself.....?
http://www.eskimo.com/~mcalpin/
http://www.eskimo.com/~mcalpin/pumkin.html
References:
- Re: Hills
- From: "Chris Andersen" <chrisa@value.net>
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index