Re: Overlooked seeds?
- To: pumpkins@mallorn.com
- Subject: Re: Overlooked seeds?
- From: B* V*
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 21:28:03 -0400
- List-Archive: <http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/> (Web Archive)
- References: <004b01c08639$bc532f80$03000004@stwe1.on.home.com>
Interesting: Connie, have not heard that before, you should have let
me know, I believe that was part of the
agreement we made when I sent you seed, report back in fall, good or
bad. I am sure I didn't charge for seed
as the only request I have ever made was a report on how you did if
you grew it. May I ask ? were these blowouts
across the vine or length wise. It must have been really motoring,
mine blew at 420 lbs with stem split, I thought I
had a good one untill it blew the stem, then I blamed myself with
fertilizier. O well that's pumpkins.
At 04:27 PM 1/24/01 , you wrote:
>I grew the 862 last year - strange things happened. It
kept blowing the
>main vine. By blowing I mean it kept breaking. At
first I thought I must
>have been clumsy and kicked it or something, but it
happened at least five
>times. I finally gave up with the main and grew two
smaller ones on secondaries.
>
>connie giambra
>S.Rafael,CA
>
>-- Original Message --
>
>>Bill,
>>
>>Sounds like a good seed, would you like to swap
seeds.
>>
>>andrew
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Bill VanIderstine
>> To: pumpkins@mallorn.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 8:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: Overlooked seeds?
>>
>>
>> andrew : I think the 862 VanIderstine if you can keep
it together, mine
>>stem split at 420 lbs
>> & the 751 VanIderstine are two sleepers. Reg
Noonan grew both this year,
>>862 planted too late
>> & 751 pumpkin , I thought he should go with but
he choose the 762 Smith
>>again re measurments
>> & was again beaten by two smaller pumpkins. I
believe it would have been
>>a different story had
>> he faith in a heavy weighing line. May not have beat
Peter but sure as
>>hell would have trimmed
>> Elayne. These two havn't had their day yet. The
breeding is there, only
>>the grower is missing.
>> That's the opion from
here. Bill Van
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> At 08:17 PM 1/23/01 , you wrote:
>> >Let's keep this topic going. Another sleeper is
the 991 hunt. I had
>a
>> >pumpkin on the 991 hunt this year, I pollinated
on the 25th of june
>and
>>was
>> >an estimated 700 pounds when it cracked on the
first of august.Very
>fast
>> >growing plant that was the third pumpkin on the
main 14 ft out. But
>had
>>a
>> >very large blossom scar and that's were it split.
The walls were 14
>inches
>> >thick in the middle and thicker at the stem but
only two inches right
>>in the
>> >middle of the blossom scar. My mother also grew
one from the 991 hunt.
>>She
>> >pollinated on July 7th and after mine split she
didn't fertilize very
>>much
>> >maybe twice in the last two months and still
manage to grow a 879.8
>(tarp
>> >weight included) or 876 without. I will be
planting this one this year.
>> >
>> >andrew
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Andrew Papez"
<apapez@home.com>
>> >To: <pumpkins@mallorn.com>
>> >Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 6:57 PM
>> >Subject: Re: Overlooked seeds?
>> >
>> >
>> >> Chris
>> >>
>> >> Another overlooked seed I think that has
huge potential is the 678
>> >> Ciliberto. Saw the results in D. Haegans
patch and her pumpkin matured
>>in
>> >> mid August and sat there losing weight for a
month and a half. Still
>> >weighed
>> >> 946 pounds.
>> >>
>> >> andrew
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Michalec, Chris"
<cmicha@chmc.org>
>> >> To: <pumpkins@mallorn.com>
>> >> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 4:56
PM
>> >> Subject: RE: Overlooked seeds?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Hi John,
>> >> > Great topic for this time
of year. There are so many seeds out
>>there
>> >> that
>> >> > look as if they have never been tried
as you review them in the
>AGGC.
>> >> > (Thanks Mike, Al, and all their helpers.) There are probably of
>>number
>> >of
>> >> > seeds with great potential that haven't been given a fair shake.
>> So
>> >many
>> >> of
>> >> > us look to see what has produced for others before we make our choices.
>> >A
>> >> > number of seeds that probably would be great may only show a few
>> >mid-sized
>> >> > offspring because they haven't been planted by the heavy hitters
>>and
>> >given
>> >> > the best chance to maximize their potential, and were grown by beginners
>> >> or
>> >> > folks who are still trying to get the hang of this. Others never
>>get
>> >> > planted at all as people wait for someone else to prove that the
>> >potential
>> >> > is there. I can think of two that haven't been mentioned that probably
>> >> have
>> >> > good potential.
>> >> > The 812 LaRue 97 Produced the 758.5 and 815.5 Baird a couple years
>> >ago,
>> >> > and either hasn't been planted since or it's offspring haven't made
>>it
>> >> into
>> >> > the database or to a weighoff. The other is the 871 Richart 97
>that
>> >Jake
>> >> > VanKooten in B.C.has done so well with, growing a 764 in 98 and
>a
>>942
>> >with
>> >> > it last year. Those are the only two offspring from that pumpkin
>>that
>> >are
>> >> > noted in the database. Seeing Jake's 942 last year made a believer
>>out
>> >of
>> >> > me and I will be planting the one 871 seed I have this spring.
>> >> > I think a lot of potential exists in many of these untried and
>>under
>> >> > utilized seed lines. I just wish I had the time and space to give
>>more
>> >of
>> >> > them a chance. You don't need to spend a lot of money chasing this
>> >years
>> >> > darlings to grow your best yet. Most of us have probably already
>> >acquired
>> >> > the seeds we need to do that. You just have to give them a chance,
>>it
>> >may
>> >> > even come from one from your own patch.
>> >> >
>> >> > Chris Michalec
>> >> > Covington, WA
>> >> > > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > > From: John Failor [SMTP:buckeye5@bright.net]
>> >> > > Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 12:44 AM
>> >> > > To: pumpkins@mallorn.com
>> >> > > Subject: Overlooked seeds?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Hello to all,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Recently I was browsing through the AGCC database and I was
>>struck
>> >> by
>> >> > > just how many seeds are there and I wonder how many of them have
>> >really
>> >> > > gotten a fair shake. With all those seeds there is way to give
>>them
>> >all
>> >> a
>> >> > > real shot and it is a better bet to plant proven seeds. After
>> >all,seeds
>> >> > > are a crape shot as it is but still I have to wonder if there
>isn't
>>a
>> >> > > juggernaut hiding in there somewhere just waiting to be discovered
>>and
>> >> > > take off. After all the top seeds are hard to come by and maybe
>>we
>> >> will
>> >> > > find the next top seed.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I would like to get the group's feedback on this subject and
>>maybe
>> >> > > some seeds they think are undiscovered monsters.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Here are some that I think might be:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Brock 685
>> >> > > Wray 738
>> >> > > Welty 809
>> >> > > Sproule 952
>> >> > > McCallum 566
>> >> > > and first generation 825 Shymanski offspring. (The 801 Stelts
>can't
>>be
>> >> the
>> >> > > only one with such stellar genetics).
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Then again I could be wrong but look at the example of the
>>903
>> >> > > Holland. It was grown in 97 and after its first year no one grew
>>a
>> >huge
>> >> > > pumpkin with it and people lost interest but this year out of
>> no
>> >where
>> >> > > Joel Holland grew a 808, 967 and 1026 with it. I bet it will get
>>more
>> >> > > attention this year!
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Any thoughts?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > John
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
>> >> > To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with
>the
>> >> > message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
>> >> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
>> >> message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
>> >To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
>> >message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
>> >
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bill Van Iderstine
>> P.E.I. Record Holder @ 862 lbs.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi To
>>sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the message
>>text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
>>
>
>
>
>
>--
>iWon <http://www.iwon.com/> - Voted the #1 portal on the Web!
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
>To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
>message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
>
Thanks,
Bill Van Iderstine
P.E.I. Record Holder @ 862 lbs.
http://aggc.1wh.com/aggc.asp
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Overlooked seeds?
- From: g*
- Re: Overlooked seeds?
- References:
- Re: Overlooked seeds?
- From: "A* P*"
- From: "A* P*"
- Re: Overlooked seeds?
- From: g*
- Re: Overlooked seeds?
- Prev by Date: one main vine
- Next by Date: Re: Overlooked seeds?
- Prev by thread: Overlooked seeds?
- Next by thread: Re: Overlooked seeds?