Re: 825.5 shymanski

To:
Subject: Re: 825.5 shymanski
From: A* P*
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 23:07:10 -0500
List-Archive: <http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/> (Web Archive)
References: <002301bf99f0$66ed6d20$03000004@stwe1.on.home.com> <38E2C4CA.E277DED0@cyber-quest.com>

Rocky,

I have the 650LLoyd,968sproule,678 ciliberto,909.5lloyd,and a lot of seed from 99 with some great crosses but not proven and I was planning on using the 750eaton next year. andrew

----- Original Message -----

From: r*@cyber-quest.com

To: pumpkins@mallorn.com

Sent: March 29, 2000 10:06 PM

Subject: Re: 825.5 shymanski

Andrew, what are your other options/ ? Checkon 815, definitely, but if not the Shymanski, what else do you have?
Andrew Papez wrote:
List members, I would like to pose a question. If you had the opportunity to plant an 825.5Shymanski would you plant it even thou it has a history of splitting.It is a good proven seed but I am limited to 2 plants.My other plant was going to be the 815Checkon and I was going to cross the two. Any opinions or suggestions. Andrew

--
***Rocky Rockwell***
Personal site - http://home.Cyber-Quest.com/Rocky.R
Pennsylvania Giant Pumpkin Grower's Association - http://www.PGPGA.com
Is a bear Catholic? Does the Pope ... ahh nevermind..... :o)

References:
- 825.5 shymanski
  - From: "A* P*"
- Re: 825.5 shymanski
  - From: R* R*

Prev by Date: Re: 825.5 shymanski
Next by Date: RE: 2000 Provincial Seminar
Prev by thread: Re: 825.5 shymanski
Next by thread: Re: 825.5 shymanski

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index