This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Guinness Book of Records
- To: "'p*@athenet.net'" <p*@athenet.net>
- Subject: Re: Guinness Book of Records
- From: "* D* G* <D*@PSS.Boeing.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 15:23:24 -0700
> Guinness Book of Records
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> * To: pumpkins@athenet.net
> * Subject: Guinness Book of Records
> * From: farmrgus@magi.com (Gus Saunders)
> * Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 13:59:55 -0400
> * Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The 1998 edition of the Guinness Book of Records is in the bookstores.
>
> It is very pleasing to see that pumpkins are listed again after a
year's
> absence.
>
> The publication correctly shows Nathan and Paula Zehr - 1061 lbs. as
the
> world record holder.
>
> All the best!
>
> Gus Saunders
> Ottawa-St.Lawrence Growers
> http://infoweb.magi.com/~farmrgus/
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> * Prev by Date: other stuff
> * Next by Date: I'm back
> * Prev by thread: I'm back
> * Next by thread: other stuff
>
> Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index |
> Thread Index
What happens if I had a larger pumpkin with a small hole and was
disqualified from the prize money but I wanted the World Record? If I
had 1200 lber, I would wave the money and allow you to open the pumpkin
to prove I did not add anything just for the record. Do you think it
would be possible to support this theory?
Could the WPC and GPC rules be revised to support this type of request?
They would give up all the money just for the Record...
Please, anyone provide comments on this suggestion.
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index