Re: Constructive


Mike I see your points, but no where in your statement (judges decision are
final) does it say you can reverse it later....all your points are great but
that one..and yes I hope we all have learned by this......wayne-----
Original Message -----
From: Mike and Vickie Brock <vbrock@mcn.org>
To: <pumpkins@hort.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 5:09 PM
Subject: Constructive


> I think that we can still be constructive in developing from this episode.
> Personally I am surprised at how many support a blatantly leaking pumpkin.
> Rot is rot no matter how you slice it.  No Technicality can change what is
> rot.
>
> At the Boonville weigh-off when we say "judges decisions are final".  This
> term is put in the rules for one reason and that is we as
judges/organizers
> will make the last call no matter how long it takes.  Its our baby.  Its
our
> call
>
> Now you can challenge a judges decision anytime at a weigh-off and we will
> look at it again.  And if our ruling  is wrong the first time .. as a
judge
> we reserve the right to change it.
>
>    as a judge it is our responsibility and our goal is to keep it fair and
> honest.
>
> Tom must be a helluv of guy, obviously a great grower.
>
> But I feel sorry for the guy that placed second.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.hort.net/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.hort.net/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index