This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: [SG] Ornamental grasses
- To: s*@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
- Subject: Re: [SG] Ornamental grasses
- From: M* T* <m*@CLARK.NET>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 03:25:42 -0400
Clyde, m' dear....picky, picky, picky. In the first place, I don't
consider myself an "expert" in anything except being behind on my email.
But, since you ask, that's why I put the word "grasses" in quotation marks.
Figured the members of this list, who are all of above average
intelligence, would get my drift.
Now that you've elected to make a big point of it, I'm sure everyone knows
what I meant. The horticultural world thanks you for your concern with
precision in terminology.
Marge Talt, zone 7 Maryland
mtalt@clark.net
Editor: Gardening in Shade
current article: Planting for Moist Shade - Part 2 - The Center Circle
http://www.suite101.com/frontpage/frontpage.cfm?topicID=222
Gardening Topic Index for Suite101:
http://www.suite101.com/userfiles/79/gardening.html
----------
> From: Clyde Crockett <CCREDUX@AOL.COM>
> Date: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 2:12 AM
>
> In a message dated 10/13/1998 12:38:38 AM Central Daylight Time,
> mtalt@CLARK.NET writes:
>
> << There are actually a
> lot of grasses, sedges, rushes and bamboos (all "grasses") >>
>
> Dear Marge,
>
> That is a very misleading statement from one who is an expert, as you
are.
> Carexes(sedges), rushes and bamboos are NOT grasses. Did you mean to
write
> (all "grass-like" plants)? As horticulturists, do you not think it would
be
> better if we were more precise in our terminology?
>
> Clyde Crockett z5 Indy IN <ccredux@aol.com>
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index