This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: bottling v. canning
- To: v*@eskimo.com
- Subject: Re: bottling v. canning
- From: A* D* <a*@crwys.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 10:53:30 +0100 (BST)
- Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 03:00:18 -0700
- Resent-From: veggie-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"IXPav1.0.Lt1.nIipr"@mx1>
- Resent-Sender: veggie-list-request@eskimo.com
On Mon 10 Aug, Allan Day wrote:
> On Mon 10 Aug, M. Mathena wrote:
>
> > Allan,
> > What is the difference between bottling and canning? Why is the cost
> > of canning so high?
> > Monica
> >
> >
> Is it the language problem? When we talk about bottling that's in glass
> jars, canning is in tinned metal containers which have to be bougnt and
> after sterilisatiom sealed with a special tool/machine. This never
> caught on in this country. A further problem is that any that do not
> sterilise or seal properly will 'blow', whereas with bottling you can
> test for this, you can see the contents and use up any rejects before
> they go bad. During and after the war we used to bottle in jamjars using
> 'Snap' enclosures (proprietary) with spring clips or another make
> Porosan which you pressed down to complete the seal. We don't see those
> around these days, but special Kilner jars can still be purchased.
>
> How about putting some of this on veggie-list, it might interest
> somebody and it's awful quiet at present.
> Allan (& Pam)
>
>
>
>
--
Allan Day Hereford HR2 7AU allan@crwys.demon.co.uk
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index