This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: NO CLUES.....?
- To: v*@eskimo.com
- Subject: Re: NO CLUES.....?
- From: C* H* <c*@uswest.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 23:31:20 -0700
- References: <64ead02e.35bd3ac6@aol.com>
- Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 22:26:23 -0700
- Resent-From: veggie-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"Ugvp71.0.Ox4._3Mlr"@mx1>
- Resent-Sender: veggie-list-request@eskimo.com
Dave,your right of course (and I'm red faced,because I actually know better)but I
was too lazy to look up the word ,carpenopathic and really didnt recall the
seedless part.
I really blew it ,apologize for passing incorrect info.Thanks for refreshing my
memory.
Connie
Pollinator@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 7/25/98 7:55:19 AM Eastern Daylight Time, coneh@uswest.net
> writes:
>
> << If its not too late in your growing zone why not try some of the
> greenhouse type cukes that require no pollinators....
> .They are all female and self pollinating.Shepard's is carrying one
> called 'Holland'which I have grown before and it was great ,non
> bitter,fast growing,12"-14"inches for me.Several of the seed houses are
> carrying this type but cant think of which others at the moment.Just a
> suggestion. >>
>
> They require no pollinators because no pollination takes place (ie. they
> are NOT self-pollinating). They set fruit carpenopathically, so they produce
> seedless fruit.
>
> Incidently, with these specialty varieties, you will get bitter fruit if
> you DO get pollination, so they are best grown in a greenhouse, where you can
> exclude all pollinators. Or else, make SURE there are no other cukes within
> pollinator range.
>
> Dave Green Hemingway, SC
> www.pollinator.com
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index