hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Petiole Shortening


being far from wise, just some short remarks.

My favourite would be the light quality, e.g. the spectrum of the different flourescent tubes.

Try to get the technical details.

I would suspect that the new light has more blue in it's spectrum and blue light is known to shorten plants (internodes, petioles etc.).

In addition flourescent tubes "age", they loose in respect to light intensity (and maybe the spectrum is altered as well). You allready suspected that light intensity plays a role and higher light intensities shorten plants as well. The new tube will probably have an higher light intensity compared to the old one, let alone that they might have the same power consumption.

A last important factor that leads to short plants is UV light. However, I do not suspect that the new flourescent tube emmits UV, but the details of the spectrum should show this, too.

And yes, I guess you can revert the pant habitus by going back to the old light conditions.

Hope this helps,


-----Original Message-----
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:57:38 +0200
Subject: [Aroid-l] Petiole Shortening
From: ted.held@us.henkel.com
To: Discussion of aroids <aroid-l@gizmoworks.com>

Dear Wise Ones,

A phenomenon has come to my attention by way of Jim Langhammer, who used to be a contributor to this list. He is a trained botanist and life-long professional fish and reptile keeper and expert. He is well known in the Detroit area (USA) since he is the retired curator of reptiles at our zoo. The reason I point out this biographical material is to emphasize that he is a close observer of the natural world and one whose observations are to be taken seriously.

Mr. Langhammer has an aquarium of 70 gallons capacity in which he has a culture of Cryptocoryne of the cordata complex. This aquarium has been maintained almost undisturbed for a decade or two with this planting and his results have been remarkable. His plants grow luxuriously with total leaf lengths of around 18 inches (46 cm) at maturity, being perhaps two-thirds petiole length and the balance leaf blade. The leaves are a rich color and apparently in the peak of health. Water is changed two or more times per week. The substrate gets no fertilization other than "mulm" from fish wastes. Over the years illumination has been provided by a single cool-white fluorescent bulb, 24-hours a day.

As it happened, a few months back he decided to switch out the cool-white fluorescent with a gro-light type with a different temperature profile. The reason for the change was to enhance the appearance of some characin fishes in the tank, which was successful.

But over the next few weeks after the bulb switch the plants experienced a dramatic contraction in the petiole length. The leaf blade dimensions did not seem to change much, but the overall leaf length is now less than about 10 inches (25 cm). Old leaves have not died and this is not simply the emergence of new leaves adapted to a new illumination regime. The petioles have contracted on the order of 50%, presumably because of a shift in the intensity or color temperature of the illumination. The petioles are not bent or otherwise distorted; just shorter.

The growth habit of the leaves, it should be noted, has changed as well. Under the old regime the leaves tended to strive upward, as if seeking light. With the new light they tend more toward a horizontal leaf blade orientation. This behavior could indicate a trigger associated with light intensity.

The same phenomenon was reported earlier by another Crypt fancier who had received offshoots from the Langhammer clone. But, at that time, we attributed the episode to the usual adjustment problems associated with radical change in culture and we did not have the controlled observation that we have in this case. The other grower was not certain that the leaves were not just new growth, for example.

We see references to plant contractile activities in certain roots (dandelions, daffodils) that serve to pull bulbs or crowns into the soil, and in tendrils, which coil and contract to pull vining plants like cucumbers toward supporting structures.

Has anyone on the list read about or observed such contractile behavior in Aroids, especially in leaves? We wonder, naturally, if a return to the old illumination regime would result in reversal. We wonder what possible physical mechanism could account for shortening on this scale.

And, I might add, we wonder if we are crazy. If you think I'm crazy I won't be offended. Others have made that inference in the past.

Any ideas?


Aroid-L mailing list

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement