Re: [Aroid-l] Amorphophallus tuber?
a late (final)
Thanks for the nice
conversation; and I think, it was a nice lesson, too.
After Lord P(remature) gave a first suggestion, I
believed him (as usual) - who am I to question what he utters?
However, someone else did and he finally
changed to Lord P(icky) and corrected himself - Chapeau! And no reason
to apologize... And a nice rest of your holidays......... :-)
Date: Fri, 17
Aug 2007 22:56:24 +0200
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Amorphophallus
From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid"
To: "'Discussion of aroids'"
Hi there Christopher and
I pulled my mind out of the swamp it is in this
holiday and reconsidered my
position on the tuber: it may indeed be
an Amchomanes as Christopher
suggests and I rejected in my previous
post. I noticed upon further looking
that there are a few roots
left on it which seem to be as thick as is usual
in Anchomanes. I
missed the roots, which are semi-permanent in Anchomanes
have been removed. It is a trifle stupid that the collector made no
picture of the leaf when it was still on the plant, or conveniently
Aroid-L mailing list
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |