Re: [Aroid-l] "minature" M. deliciosa??
- Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] "minature" M. deliciosa??
- From: &* F* <j*@wanadoo.fr>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 20:53:13 +0100
|
Dear all, |
|
|
I you sendings a photograph of Rhaphidophora
tetrasperma which I made this morning at the botanical garden
of Nancy.
In 2000, I went to Munich with David Scherberich and we met
Josef Bogner. He gave me a cutting of this
Monstera. He said that it was a dwarf form of Monstera deliciosa. In
fact, it is about Rhaphidophora tetrasperma. This plant is splendid and I
think that it deserves to be marketed.
Cordially,
Geneviève Ferry
Jardin botanique de Nancy
France |
----- Original Message -----
From:
b*@malesiana.com
To: aroid-l@gizmoworks.com
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:15
PM
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] "minature" M.
deliciosa??
Dear Julius and All
In the 90s while working on
Rhaphidophora I investigated the so-called miniature form of M.
deliciosa in cultivation in Europe (and as named in Birdsey's Cultivated
Aroids as 'Dwarf Ceriman') and these plants were without
exception Rhaphidophora tetrasperma from Peninsular Malaysia and
southern Thailand.
At the time Josef had a large one flowering in
Munich and it was from here that I obtained inflorescences to confirm the
generic Id. Material from this clone was later used by one of my students Tam
Shey May for molecular work on the Monstereae and embedded in the
Rhaphidophora clade as sister to R. nicolsonii from Pen.
Malaysia while M. deliciosa (one of she outgroups) remained clustered
with Stenopsermation and a Rhodospatha. Thus morphologically
(ovules/seeds) and on molecular (trn-l/trn-f) the European
'Dwarf'Deliciosa'is a Rhaphidophora.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 5:42
AM
Subject: [Aroid-l] "minature" M.
deliciosa??
> Dear All, > > A question--what is the status of the
existence of a true 'minature' clone > of Monstera deliciosa, and what,
it it does exist, are the measurements of a > MATURE leaf of this
mimature????? > I THINK I remember a discussion on this back when we
exchanged ideas about > the non-existence of the 'red-varigated' clone
of the same species which, I > believe, turned out to be a
photo-shopped/modified picture of the > white-varigated variety of this
species. > I THINK I recall someone saying that the common and BIG clone
of this was a > selection from the wild, and if one went back to the
area where this plant > occured in Coastal Mexico, one would have
difficulty in finding such a large > clone, most wild plants of this
species were substantially smaller that the > big one we see everywhere
in cultivation Worldwide. > Any information would be
welcome! > > Good Growing! > > Julius >
> > _______________________________________________ >
Aroid-l mailing list > Aroid-l@gizmoworks.com >
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l > >
_______________________________________________ Aroid-l mailing
list Aroid-l@gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
|
Attachment:
Rhaphidophora tetrasperma.JPG
Description: JPEG image
_______________________________________________
Aroid-l mailing list
Aroid-l@gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index