Re: Wikipedia`s falsehoods

**&* <m*@hctc.com>**

If you have access to a university computer system, they may
be subscribed to JSTOR, Biological Abstracts, or some
similar database.  These will take you to peer-reviewed
articles.  JSTOR is especially useful, because every article
it references is scanned in its entirety in the database --
you can read it righ on your monitor.

Of course, this necessitates that something BE published on
the taxon in question.  For some obscure taxa, there is
nothing out there.  Another drawback to JSTOR is that is you
search the full-text of the articles, you may get articles
in which your search term appears only in the "works cited,"
as part of the title of another article you probably already
read.

Jason Hernandez
Naturalist-at-Large

> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:37:45 -0800 (PST)
> From: "E.Vincent Morano" <ironious2@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Wikipedia`s falsehoods
> To: Discussion of aroids <aroid-l@gizmoworks.com>
> Message-ID: <547443.98273.qm@web63403.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> any idea's on where to find an unbiased source?
> 
> --- On Sat, 1/31/09, ju-bo@msn.com <ju-bo@msn.com> wrote:

_______________________________________________
Aroid-L mailing list
Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l