hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

{Disarmed} [Aroid-l] OT: Rafflesia reclassified as Euphorbiaceae?

  • Subject: {Disarmed} [Aroid-l] OT: Rafflesia reclassified as Euphorbiaceae?
  • From: Rosalind Gold <rozgold@pacbell.net>
  • Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:00:21 -0800 (PST)

With all of this discussion of Rafflesia, I thought I'd pass   on a link to a recent Science News article:   http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20070113/fob5.asp - if this got posted before, my apologies - I'm trying to catch up on my e-mails after being out of town for a while.
-Roz in Southern California

Science News Online

Biggest Bloom: Superflower changes branch on family tree

Susan Milius
Plants with buds the size of basketballs, which open flowers up to a meter across, must be reclassified as relatives of poinsettias, say researchers who've examined the DNA of the world's largest known flowers.
HUGE CHANGE. Rafflesia arnoldii ranks as the species with the largest known individual bloom. Smelling of rotting flesh, the meter-wide flower attracts carrion-loving insects for pollination.
J. Holden
For almost 2 centuries, botanists have debated where rafflesia plants, with their odd flowers, sit on the plant family tree. Early observers asked whether they were flowering plants or fungi. Later, botanists disagreed about the plants' nearest relatives. Some pointed to passionflowers, with their elaborate collars and fused sex organs, while others argued for pipevines, with their big, meat-colored flowers.
Now, after analyzing eight genes, Charles C. Davis of Harvard University and his colleagues put the rafflesias in other company. The closest relatives of rafflesias lie in Euphorbiaceae, the family of poinsettias and castor beans, the researchers say in a paper released online by Science.
All 50 species of rafflesias, including some small-flowered ones, live as parasites on plants in the grape family in Southeast Asia.
J. Holden
Although holiday decorators may think of poinsettias as big flowers, botanists see all that red fandangle as bracts, or modified leaves, that surround tiny true flowers. The Euphorbiaceae family includes plenty of other tiny flowers, and the species within it that Davis and his colleagues have identified as the nearest relatives of rafflesias have blooms only a few millimeters across.
Davis calculates that some little dot of an ancestor started a 79-fold size increase during the past 46 million years to yield the modern champ Rafflesia arnoldii.
Rafflesias have also evolved into parasites without true roots or leaves, and as such provide a huge challenge for gardeners trying to grow them (SN: 9/11/99, p. 172). Davis says that he knows of only four botanic gardens that have successfully grown any rafflesias.
People sometimes confuse rafflesias with the big, smelly Amorphophallus corpse lily, Davis says. However, the corpse lily isn't a single flower but instead a blooming spike a meter or so long covered with hundreds of tiny flowers.
Davis' new assertion is a surprise, says Todd Barkman of Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo. He does agree that rafflesias belong on the big evolutionary tree branch occupied by the order Malpighiales, which includes the family Euphorbiaceae. He and his colleagues published that conclusion, based on a DNA analysis, in 2004. However, Barkman says that flower structures don't suggest to him that rafflesias are close to poinsettias and castor beans.
"No botanist in their right mind would have accepted a bet that among the 38 families of Malpighiales, it would be the Euphorbiaceae," says Susanne Renner, the systematist who directs the Munich Botanical Garden.
It's not clear whether the new results will lead to renaming the storied family Rafflesiaceae. "That would really bristle some people," says Davis. "They're our charismatic megaflora."

If you have a comment on this article that you would like considered for publication in Science News, send it to editors@sciencenews.org. Please include your name and location.

To subscribe to Science News (print), go to
https://www.kable.com/pub/scnw/ subServices.asp.
To sign up for the free weekly e-LETTER from Science News, go to
Davis, C.C., et al. In press. Floral gigantism in Rafflesiaceae. Science. Abstract available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1135260.
Further Readings:
Milius, S. 1999. The science of big, weird flowers. Science News 156(Sept. 11):172-174. References and sources available at http://www.sciencenews.org/pages/sn_arc99/9_11_99/bob2ref.htm. Full text (in pdf format) available at http://www.sciencenews.org/pages/pdfs/data/
For further information and pictures of parasitic plants, go to http://www.parasiticplants.siu.edu/.
Todd Barkman
Western Michigan University
Department of Biological Sciences
3437 Wood Hall
Kalamazoo, MI 49008
Charles C. Davis
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology
Harvard University Herbaria
22 Divinity Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
Susanne S. Renner
Ludwig Maximilians University Munich
Systematische Botanik
Menzinger Straße 67
D-80638 München

From Science NewsVol. 171, No. 2, Jan. 13, 2007, p. 21.

Copyright (c) 2007 Science Service. All rights reserved.
Aroid-l mailing list

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement