Re: [aroid-l] A. titanum bloom at UCD

---

• Subject: Re: [aroid-l] A. titanum bloom at UCD
• From: &* D* M* <d*@interpac.net>
• Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 20:27:22 -1000

At the top left of the site that is mentioned in the original site,
http://www-pubcomm.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=6454   under the
word "News" is the date 6.3.2004.  Then the date on the article itself is
June 4, 2003.  I sent them an e-mail enquiry, and suggested they do a
follow-up story on the single leaf.  They could pick another date out of
their hat.  Not a bad story anyway.  Gary

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ken@spatulacity.com>
To: <aroid-l@lists.ncsu.edu>
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: [aroid-l] A. titanum bloom at UCD


> I may be confused, but not usually *this* confused! June 9th, talked about
> on the web page, has not happend yet, and Monday June 9 is not a date in
> the year 2004...  So, when did this actually happen?
> -Ken
>

• References:
  • [aroid-l] A. titanum bloom at UCD
    • From: A* W* &*
  • Re: [aroid-l] A. titanum bloom at UCD
    • From: k*

• Prev by Date: Re: [aroid-l] A. titanum seed
• Next by Date: Re: [aroid-l] A. titanum bloom at UCD
• Previous by thread: Re: [aroid-l] A. titanum bloom at UCD
• Next by thread: Re: [aroid-l] A. titanum bloom at UCD