Re: Monstera question..
- Subject: Re: Monstera question..
- From: &* <m*@hctc.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:36:37 -0800
>M. friedrichstahalii
> is a synonym of M. adansonii. However, plants of mistaken
> determination labeled M. friedrichstalii were actually M.
> siltepecana.
:Pulling out my hair: AAARRRRGGGHHH!!
How is anyone supposed to keep all this straight? So in my
last Aroideana article, I made reference to a plant that
could have been either one of two possible species, neither
of which are the name I used. I identified it as M.
freidrichsthallii based in part on _Exotica 4_, supplemented
by Internet images. So now I'm spinning in circles
wondering whether it was M. adansonii, or M. siltepecana.
It was a persisting plant from a garden long since reverted
to rainforest in Hawaii, so there is no way to know the
provenance.
All I can say is, it's a good thing that species was just a
"cameo" in my article, not one of the main foci.
Jason Hernandez
Naturalist-at-Large
_______________________________________________
Aroid-L mailing list
Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index