hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Tropical forest dreams and nightmares

  • Subject: Re: Tropical forest dreams and nightmares
  • From: StellrJ@aol.com
  • Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:41:17 -0500 (CDT)

In a message dated Wed, 16 May 2001 11:14:54 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Betsy Feuerstein <ecuador@midsouth.rr.com> writes:

<< I know of NO country  that has large tracts of untouched jungles, rainforests, forests, in general.  

Do not be fooled by those world globes that show vegetation as it would naturally be, not as it presently is.  Remember, those globes show eastern North America as deciduous forest, when, in fact, we know it is mainly a unique form of grassland we call "lawn."  But, does your above comment mean that even the great boreal forests of Canada's Northwest Territories -- which are simply left out of even the most comprehensive highway atlases I have seen -- are also fragmented?  If so, then there is no hope in the long run.

<<Yes, you can find the jungle....it may be next to a bouldered stream and difficult  to get to or it may be beyond the edge of the road meaning some of us have  hours of trudging through, over, and on top of God knows what is under  us and if it will hold us, just to get to the illusive remaining jungle.

Inaccessibility is the last, best hope for nature.  Even "ecotourism" brings development to the very areas it strives to preserve.  In the new millennium, only the inacessible will survive unspoiled.

<<  Change...... that is  all there is, change. Either we adjust or we do not and we suffer. I choose  to not suffer and just know gratitude for the past days and hold a hope  that my grandkids will someday know the joys of walking in the forest,  temporate or tropical, and know the joy of that peace and that wonder.

Grandkids will not -- not in the sense that we still can.  There may be preserves here and there, but these will be akin to museums -- collections of relics to remind us of a bygone past.  No doubt they will be micromanaged to preserve what remants remain in them.  Wilderness?  Forget it!  Such a world would undoubtedly be livable, in the sense that human needs could be met; but to a personality like mine, it would not be worth living in.

On the other hand, I do maintain a fantasy that, many generations from now, after some catastrophe on a global scale has greatly reduced the human population, and the survivors coalesced into small areas, then nature will reclaim its lost lands.  Extinct species will never return, of course, but new types of ecosystems will rise, phoenix-like, from the ashes, and species hanging on the verge of extinciton will rebound in the absence of human pressures.

Jason Hernandez

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index