Re: Lysichitum camtschatcense
> In a message dated 5/5/99, 2:43:55 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
> <<My 1916 issue of Bailey says the range is E. Siberia, Japan, Alaska,
> Oregon? I should think that would put it not only in Hitchcock and Cronquist
> (where I do not recall seeing it), but in popular guides to Pacific States
> flowers. Perhaps your old source used mislabeled specimens; or perhaps it
> once existed in Oregon, but has been extirpated there. I must look into
I just checked Hitchcock and Cronquist. Lysichitum camtschatcense is NOT listed.