hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Dracontium prancei question

  • Subject: Re: Dracontium prancei question
  • From: "Daniel Devor" <plantguy@zoominternet.net>
  • Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:11:59 -0500

Hi Julius,

I feel pretty confident of the ID as it came from a member here that is a 
great grower of Dracontium down under, but you can see a pic of the 
influorescence from 3 years ago here: 

I do not believe in posting pics to the messages as it causes problems for 
some people with slow connections.

If it requires dormancy then I hope I never see a bloom again to be honest. 
I would hate to have it go dormant as it is just a lovely plant with the 
petiole and leaf.

I do have a few other Dracontium, including one that is not identified from 
Brasil that has offset like mad in the year I've owned it.  I wish my D. 
prancei would do that, but I know it had babies when I unpotted and they are 
just not prone to growing like my other species.

I should say that others like D. gigas, pittierii and peruvianum have not 
appreciated my home environment and have never done well for me.  They seem 
to hang on OK, but never are happy it seems.

I think you are right about the blooming all at the same time.  I guess I 
was hoping that it came from an area that did not have a true dormancy 
induced by a dry season.



Dan Devor
Gibsonia, PA

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ju-bo@msn.com>
To: <aroid-l@gizmoworks.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 2:08 PM
Subject: [Aroid-l] Dracontium prancei question

 To: Discussion of aroids (aroid-l@gizmoworks.com)
 Security scan upon download Trend Micro ® logo
 Attachments: ATT00001 (0.1 KB)

 Dear Dan,

 Send us a pic. of the inflorscence and we`ll give you an opinion of it`s 
 To give a simple answer to your involved question, I don`t believe that the 
plant will bloom if kept/grown as an evergreen for the 12 months of the 
year.   Many plants need the ''stimulus'' of a dry dormancy to induce 
blooming.   It might be that the ''dry'' season tells the plant that all is 
NOT well in its surroundings, and so induces a bloom/reproduction.   If it 
has water all year, all is well, so why not just grow new leaves, and 
increase the size of the corm.  But IF it becomes dry!---you go dormant, and 
when the ''rains'' start again, produce a bloom, set seed (all other plants 
of this species in the vicinity will ALSO be blooming after the dry 
season!!) and reproduce!  Dormancy might also induce the "mother"-corm to 
produce the little bulbils/mini-corms on top of the main corm.

 The Best,


>>Hi All,

 I have a simple question about Dracontium prancei and that is whether it 
only flowers after a dormancy?  I got one of these beauties 3 years ago from 
a reliable Aussie source (he can volunteer his name if he wishes) and it 
bloomed the first year I had it before growing a petiole several months 
later.  Since then it has been evergreen and has actually proven to be a 
fantastic member of the genus even for a northern gardener growing it 
indoors for the winter (something that can not be said for many other 
species I am afraid to say).  It has only ever had a single petiole at one 
time, with the old petiole dyeing away after the new one gets completely 
developed (if you count that as 2 petioles then so be it, but I personally 
do not).  A new petiole is now developing and it looks like it will be 
nicely taller than the old one which was approximately 1.5 m tall (~4.5 
feet).  When I repotted the plant while in growth a year ago the tuber was 
approximately 7-8 cm in diameter.  It has never produced any offsets and 
that is OK by me as long as momma continues to do well.
 I have no intention of allowing this plant to go dormant, but am curious if 
this is the only way to get another influorescence??  Since getting them out 
of dormancy is the tough part for me and the petiole/leaf is more inspired 
than the influorescence I ask more out of curiosity rather than this being 
something I will put into practice.



 Dan Devor
 Gibsonia, PA (zone 6a)<<

Aroid-L mailing list

Aroid-L mailing list

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement