hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Dracontium prancei question

  • Subject: Re: Dracontium prancei question
  • From: George Yao <gcyao@mydestiny.net>
  • Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:44:20 +0800

Hello Dan,

I also have a prancei. I found that when I 
detached the cormlets, then they sprouted after 
some time, whereas, those that remained attached 
did not sprout. They probably got absorbed back 
into the main tuber. Also, the bigger the 
cormlet, the higher the chance of survival.

George Yao

At 11/26/2007 12:11 PM, you wrote:

>Hi Julius,
>I feel pretty confident of the ID as it came from a member here that is a
>great grower of Dracontium down under, but you can see a pic of the
>influorescence from 3 years ago here:
>I do not believe in posting pics to the messages as it causes problems for
>some people with slow connections.
>If it requires dormancy then I hope I never see a bloom again to be honest.
>I would hate to have it go dormant as it is just a lovely plant with the
>petiole and leaf.
>I do have a few other Dracontium, including one that is not identified from
>Brasil that has offset like mad in the year I've owned it.  I wish my D.
>prancei would do that, but I know it had babies when I unpotted and they are
>just not prone to growing like my other species.
>I should say that others like D. gigas, pittierii and peruvianum have not
>appreciated my home environment and have never done well for me.  They seem
>to hang on OK, but never are happy it seems.
>I think you are right about the blooming all at the same time.  I guess I
>was hoping that it came from an area that did not have a true dormancy
>induced by a dry season.
>Dan Devor
>Gibsonia, PA
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <ju-bo@msn.com>
>To: <aroid-l@gizmoworks.com>
>Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 2:08 PM
>Subject: [Aroid-l] Dracontium prancei question
>  To: Discussion of aroids (aroid-l@gizmoworks.com)
>  Security scan upon download Trend Micro ® logo
>  Attachments: ATT00001 (0.1 KB)
>  Dear Dan,
>  Send us a pic. of the inflorscence and we`ll give you an opinion of it`s
>  To give a simple answer to your involved question, I don`t believe that the
>plant will bloom if kept/grown as an evergreen for the 12 months of the
>year.   Many plants need the ''stimulus'' of a dry dormancy to induce
>blooming.   It might be that the ''dry'' season tells the plant that all is
>NOT well in its surroundings, and so induces a bloom/reproduction.   If it
>has water all year, all is well, so why not just grow new leaves, and
>increase the size of the corm.  But IF it becomes dry!---you go dormant, and
>when the ''rains'' start again, produce a bloom, set seed (all other plants
>of this species in the vicinity will ALSO be blooming after the dry
>season!!) and reproduce!  Dormancy might also induce the "mother"-corm to
>produce the little bulbils/mini-corms on top of the main corm.
>  The Best,
>  Julius
> >>Hi All,
>  I have a simple question about Dracontium prancei and that is whether it
>only flowers after a dormancy?  I got one of these beauties 3 years ago from
>a reliable Aussie source (he can volunteer his name if he wishes) and it
>bloomed the first year I had it before growing a petiole several months
>later.  Since then it has been evergreen and has actually proven to be a
>fantastic member of the genus even for a northern gardener growing it
>indoors for the winter (something that can not be said for many other
>species I am afraid to say).  It has only ever had a single petiole at one
>time, with the old petiole dyeing away after the new one gets completely
>developed (if you count that as 2 petioles then so be it, but I personally
>do not).  A new petiole is now developing and it looks like it will be
>nicely taller than the old one which was approximately 1.5 m tall (~4.5
>feet).  When I repotted the plant while in growth a year ago the tuber was
>approximately 7-8 cm in diameter.  It has never produced any offsets and
>that is OK by me as long as momma continues to do well.
>  I have no intention of allowing this plant to go dormant, but am curious if
>this is the only way to get another influorescence??  Since getting them out
>of dormancy is the tough part for me and the petiole/leaf is more inspired
>than the influorescence I ask more out of curiosity rather than this being
>something I will put into practice.
>  Thanks,
>  Dan
>  Dan Devor
>  Gibsonia, PA (zone 6a)<<
>Aroid-L mailing list
>Aroid-L mailing list
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.7/1151 
>- Release Date: 11/25/2007 4:24 PM

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.7/1151 - Release Date: 11/25/2007 4:24 PM

Aroid-L mailing list

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement