Re: [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- From: B* <c*@cfl.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:04:17 -0400
- List-archive: <http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/private/aroid-l>
Philodendron and anthurium were largely
treated decades ago in Aroideana. I have been highly disappointed at
the over-emphasis of amorphophallus and other tuberous aroids in the
most recent decades, so much so that I occasionally consider canceling
my membership and subscription. Sadly, aglaonema, syngonium,
raphidophora, epipremnum and other genera are only occasionally
mentioned these days. I guess I'm old school, I find the tuberous
aroids boring and only slightly interesting. I have no clue why they
have taken Society members by storm. Russ central Fla jlgate wrote:
|
_______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- From: &* B* &*
- Re: [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- From: &* &*
- Re: [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- References:
- [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- From: &* &*
- [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- Prev by Date: Re: [Aroid-l] unusual Anthurium berry
- Next by Date: Re: [Aroid-l] unusual Anthurium berry
- Previous by thread: [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- Next by thread: Re: [Aroid-l] Aroideana