This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Re: Trash

I believe so...and you have to admit--it's a heck of a business model. Content for free, or nearly so, a small editing/publishing staff and they've got themselves some staying power. Many of us have seen it, and, despite the fact that we may be beyond its target market in gardening experience, it's already been pointed out that many are not. Just think how often garden writers are asked to rehash the same, basic, beginner's hand's on material. Horticulture and Fine Gardening have BOTH started on the slippery path AWAY from the experienced gardener. That leaves Garden Design and British publications for those of us interested in more. 


On Aug 16, 2010, at 8:16 PM, Daryl wrote:
Yeah, sure. You and I used Velvia, but since many of the photos were sent in by homeowners, I wonder. I think that most of them probably used regular old C-41 process Kodak or Fotomat/Fuji film.
Now that I think more about the farm/country mag back in the old days, IIRC they sent photographers, but wasn't B and B amateur from the beginning? 

d



                  2 6 2 . 4 9 0 . 6 1 6 3
         New York       NJ        Philadelphia

_______________________________________________
gardenwriters mailing list
gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters

GWL has searchable archives at:
http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters

Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos

Post gardening questions/threads to
"Gardenwriters on Gardening" <gwl-g@lists.ibiblio.org>

For GWL website and Wiki, go to
http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index