This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
RE: A variation on the sqft layout...?
- To: "S*@Listbot. Com" <s*@listbot.com>
- Subject: RE: A variation on the sqft layout...?
- From: "* D* <t*@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 22:52:54 -0400
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <19990411222103.92507.qmail@hotmail.com>
Square Foot Gardening List - http://www.flinet.com/~gallus/sqft.html
My beds are 4X8 or 4X10 except the one by the fence which is 2X10.
If you can reach two squares from one side and two squares from the other,
then 4Xwhatever is OK. If you have trouble reaching the second square from
the outside, 3Xwhatever or 4X4 would be better.
I had an area that was 5X5 once, I put a stone in the center to step on and
was able to work the whole thing.
` 0**************** Bill and Aula DeWitt *****************0
* It is important to believe God's word *
* and act on it promptly while His angels *
* are waiting to work for us. *
0********* http://home.earthlink.net/~thedewitts ********0
> Has anyone ever tried this variation or something like it: instead of
> 4foot by 4foot blocks, have one long `column` of 4ft-wide or 3ft-wide
> rows, all surrounded by a path, like this:
>
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to sqft-unsubscribe@listbot.com
Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index