Re: HIST: TB: Pink Opal- use of species designation

This is an apology for a foolish mistake I made last Saturday.

>   Pink Opal is not a typical I. pallida, but close to average I. 
pallida.  A few color modifiers, and few shpe modifiers, but the DNA 
is still basicly I. pallida.  

This obviously doesn't go with the post I just made.

"What I wrote a few days ago was based on the assumption that all of a 
plant's ancesters were actually of the same species, I. pallida in 
this instance.  I was making no claim that this was the case in this 
instance."

The second statement is what I stand by.  The first was made while 
confusing Pink Opal with something else entirely.  It is for good 
reason I mostly lurk.  
Sorry.
Walter





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpTY2A/lzNLAA/yQLSAA/2gGylB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iris-photos/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    iris-photos-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index