This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: to be or not to be
- To: iris-photos@egroups.com>
- Subject: Re: [iris-photos] to be or not to be
- From: "Mike Sutton" suttons@lightspeed.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 06:37:13 -0700
- References: 000b01bfb5db$5ce15600$1114a5d1@suttons> 3912038E.E4D8869C@uswest.net>
Hello Jeff and Pat,
Good to see you made it back in one piece! How was the
rest of your trip? Thanks for the input, I think you are the only one on
the list who has seen it "up close and personal" It was the one I asked
you about in the back re-select beds. If I remember right, you said you
liked it out there too. Great to meet the two of you, hope you can come by
again next year.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From:
k*@uswest.net
To: i*@egroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 4:11
PM
Subject: Re: [iris-photos] to be or not
to be
Mike,
I believe this was one of the iris I recently saw first hand. Yes
introduce it, for the color splashed pattern in the falls as well as the warm
golden hues seen in the style arms.
Thanks for showing us your wonderful gardens. Jeff and Pat Kurtzeman
Mike Sutton wrote:
Need some help. I really like the color and form of this flower.
The branching is tight. Buds are adequate to good. What do you
all think of it? Should it be intro'd or not?ThanksMike
|
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index