hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Schiaparelli

  • Subject: Re: [iris-photos] Schiaparelli
  • From: Sterling Okase sterling_o@yahoo.com
  • Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 06:34:19 -0800 (PST)

Hi Griff,

Yes, all the above has affected the photo. Plus
scanning and adjusting color, light, hues with
PhotoShop. The color is actually light pink (not
salmon) with a "hot pink" beard (not tangerine or
red). Wouldn't it be wonderful if irises were really
THAT pink?

Seattle WA USA
zone 8

--- "J. Griffin Crump" <jgcrump@erols.com> wrote:
> ...Something, though, 
> imparts a bit more salmon
> color to most of the flowers than SCHIAPARELLI shows
> in my garden ...
> ...with the "hot pink" beard.  Could be difference
> soils, light, film?  --
> Griff

Do you Yahoo!?
Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs from home.
Over 14,500 titles. Free Shipping
& No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index