iris-photos@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: Re: Quality Standards
- From: "r*@clas.net" <r*@minesmo.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:23:00 -0500
ï Hi Betty/all - On their arrival I did not, I hoped
that I would be able to plant and get them to survive. I know some times
the best of us have garden problems. I felt that maybe
this person was doing the best to fill orders they had recieved, I
appreciate that. But, there comes a time when anyone should be able
to see they are not meeting the needs of customers when they are
sending inferior quality items. I have contacted the garden mine
came from-am waiting for a response.
I think the worst part is the anticipation of
growing something wonderful and new, being willing to pay high dollar amount for
the priviledge, and recieving something that will be at best difficult to
sustain and 2 years at best to see the flower. And, then as does sometimes
happen, the risk of finding you did not recieve the variety you ordered.
I would never put that person's name out here
because this may have been very isolated events, perhaps this was a bad growing
year for several big gardens, I do not know. My point only being that
growers/sellers-I feel- should be very aware of what the purchaser anticipates
when paying more than $40-$50 for a rhizome.
Having read some of the other posts since this
one-I have problem with a smaller rhizome if it does indeed have increase
present, but a small, dry rhizome arriving in early August with 3-5 small leaves
and one tiny increase (wish I had a photo-but go back to Loic's posted photo)
would have difficulty surviving in any garden in Missouri at that time.
Rose Kinnard
Fredericktown, Mo
Zone 6
Switch to: i*@yahoogroups.com?subject=Change Delivery Format: Traditional,
i*@yahoogroups.com?subject=Email Delivery: Digest â i*@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe
â Terms of Use . |
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Quality Standards
- From: B* W* &*
- Re: Re: Quality Standards
- References:
- Re: Quality Standards
- From: L* M* &*
- Re: Re: Quality Standards
- From: &* t* &*
- Re: Re: Quality Standards
- From: &* &*
- Re: Re: Quality Standards
- From: B* W* &*
- Re: Quality Standards
- Prev by Date: Re: RE: 2011 convention
- Next by Date: RE: convention 2011
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: Quality Standards
- Next by thread: Re: Re: Quality Standards