Re: CAT: Quality (Unfair way to judge!)
- Subject: Re: [iris-talk] CAT: Quality (Unfair way to judge!)
- From: B* &* D* L*
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 08:26:49 -0400
Doris, I am sorry , it was Sterling that I disagreed with! Donna In North Carolina where the need for rain has my mind twisting things around! ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Save on REALTOR Fees http://us.click.yahoo.com/Xw80LD/h1ZEAA/Ey.GAA/2gGylB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CAT: Quality (Unfair way to judge!)
- From: "D* E*"
- From: "D* E*"
- Re: CAT: Quality (Unfair way to judge!)
- References:
- Re: CAT: Quality (was Another Order IN!!)
- From: S* O*
- From: S* O*
- Re: CAT: Quality (was Another Order IN!!)
- From: "D* E*"
- From: "D* E*"
- Re: CAT: Quality (Unfair way to judge!)
- From: "B* &* D* L*"
- From: "B* &* D* L*"
- Re: CAT: Quality (was Another Order IN!!)
- Prev by Date: Re: CAT: Quality (Unfair way to judge!)
- Next by Date: Re: Re: AD: rz sale/the end
- Previous by thread: Re: CAT: Quality (Unfair way to judge!)
- Next by thread: Re: CAT: Quality (Unfair way to judge!)