Re: TB: FEATURE ATTRACTION
- Subject: Re: [iris-talk] TB: FEATURE ATTRACTION
- From: J* a* C* W*
- Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 08:20:34 -0700
> rainacre@aol.com wrote:
> This thread puts me in mind of the similar discussion of Feature
Attraction which would seem from our postings to not grow anywhere and
which in fact got a very high AM. Let's face it, both EW and FA do grow
well enough in enough places to be getting their awards,
> unless you want to think the judging system isn't working at all.
Fred,
Feature Attraction was a bit slower than most to take hold here, but once
it did, it hasn't looked back. I would put it in the top 10 or 20% of all
TBs for performance here. One of our local club members always brings a
bucket of FA rhizomes to our local sale every other year when he divides
his clump. I have seen FA growing at Schreiners, and as Vince Lewonski sez,
it seems to be a weaker grower there than it is here. However, being a
commercial garden, maybe they just don't allow it enough time to take hold
before they dig and divide it again.
Jeff Walters in northern Utah (USDA Zone 4/5, Sunset Zone 2, AHS Zone 7)
jcwalters@bridgernet.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
