Re: SPEC/REF: BIS species book--mini-review II


>Greetings,
>
>I am not a scientist, and I don't know much, but my initial impression of the
>new Cambridge Species book is in accord with Tom's. I was disappointed with
>the cultural information and the illustrations are pretty small, as is the
>type. Some of the essays seem less than compelling as well. Mathew's book is
>thin in places, but I'd still recommend it first.
>
Sorry to be dense...what is "Mathew's book"?  Are any of these the HORTUS
III book that has been discussed?

Nancy Jentzsch
Southern Colorado
Zone 5 - Sunset zone 2




Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index