Re: SPEC/REF: BIS species book--mini-review II
- To: Multiple recipients of list <i*@rt66.com>
- Subject: Re: SPEC/REF: BIS species book--mini-review II
- From: N* J* <j*@csn.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 12:42:43 -0600 (MDT)
>Greetings,
>
>I am not a scientist, and I don't know much, but my initial impression of the
>new Cambridge Species book is in accord with Tom's. I was disappointed with
>the cultural information and the illustrations are pretty small, as is the
>type. Some of the essays seem less than compelling as well. Mathew's book is
>thin in places, but I'd still recommend it first.
>
Sorry to be dense...what is "Mathew's book"? Are any of these the HORTUS
III book that has been discussed?
Nancy Jentzsch
Southern Colorado
Zone 5 - Sunset zone 2