RE: Ray Waterman - for what it's worth
- To: "'pumpkins@mallorn.com'"
- Subject: RE: Ray Waterman - for what it's worth
- From: M* C*
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:45:34 -0700
It seems this happens at some point every year. Ray has been a source of
controversy for some time in this sport. Whenever you hear criticism
though, consider the source. The man has contributed much to this sport and
that should be recognized and respected. I don't personally know him but I
recognize that he has contributed far more than many of his critics. When
the question arises about where the more experienced and successful growers
have gone and why they aren't contributing this is the sort of thing that
has to be considered. I'm with Marv and Barb lets keep things civil and on
topic and try not to drive off some of our best resources for experience and
knoweledge.
Chris Michalec
Covington, WA
heavypumpkin@excite.com
cmicha@chmc.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Nepereny [SMTP:cucurbyte@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 8:07 AM
> To: pumpkins@mallorn.com
> Subject: Ray Waterman - for what it's worth
>
> There's been a lot of negative, public posts regarding Ray Waterman
> lately.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
