Re: [SG] help with ID was: cimicifuga

---

• To: s*@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
• Subject: Re: [SG] help with ID was: cimicifuga
• From: C* C* <C*@AOL.COM>
• Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:11:22 EDT

In a message dated 6/17/1998 4:26:31 AM Central Daylight Time, mtalt@CLARK.NET
writes:

<<
 Where are the taxonomists who can sort out whether C. ramosa is still or
 ever was valid??  Hortus III, which is getting sadly out of date, does not
 list C. ramosa at all, even as a var. of C. simplex.  >>
I do believe that "ramosa" is a nomen nudum--sorry Bobbi.
It's simplex, pure and "simplex!"
Clyde Crockett

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [SG] help with ID was: cimicifuga
    • From: K* L* &*

• Prev by Date: Re: [SG] Jack-in-the-Pulpit
• Next by Date: [SG] Cimicifuga ramosa
• Prev by thread: Re: [SG] help with ID was: cimicifuga
• Next by thread: Re: [SG] help with ID was: cimicifuga