Re: [Aroid-l] Philodendron stenolobum and P. bipinnatifidum?
- Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Philodendron stenolobum and P. bipinnatifidum?
- From: a san juan firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
btw, the paper you are refering to is
E.G. Gonçalves and E.R. Salviani (2002). New species
and changing concepts of Philodendron subgenus
Meconostigma (Araceae). Aroideana 25:2-15
--- Russ <email@example.com> wrote:
> My recollection of P. stenolobum from the IAS show
> at Fairchild last Sept
> is that all lobes on the leaf are
> extremely narrow and long, and is not the
> philodendron in this picture.
> There was some controversy between
> what I believe is now known as stenolobum and
> another plant then called
> williamsii. P. williamsii, at that time was
> described as having a leaf much
> wider in all parts, tips of all lobes were more
> blunt, and was considered
> the species, while the plant now called stenolobum
> was thought to be a
> hybrid of some kind.
> Seems like last year or so someone straightened all
> this out, with the
> magnificently regal narrow leaved plant
> being identified as the species stenolobum, and I
> guess the less attractive
> plant is still williamsii.
> Someone help me with this. There were some great
> photos of the large
> stenolobum that won a first in the
> Fairchild show, but I couldn't find them at IAS
> So, based on what I remember, my impression of the
> plant in the photo is
> that it looks more like williamsii than stenolobum.
> Aroid-l mailing list
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Aroid-l mailing list
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |