Re: [Aroid-l] Philodendron stenolobum and P. bipinnatifidum?

**a san juan k*@yahoo.com**

btw, the paper you are refering to is 

E.G. Gonçalves and E.R. Salviani (2002). New species
and changing concepts of Philodendron subgenus
Meconostigma (Araceae). Aroideana 25:2-15

--- Russ <chammer@cfl.rr.com> wrote:

> My recollection of P. stenolobum from  the IAS show
> at Fairchild last Sept
> is that all lobes on the leaf are
> extremely narrow and long, and is not the
> philodendron in this picture.
> There was some controversy between
> what I believe is now known as stenolobum and
> another  plant then called
> williamsii.  P. williamsii, at that time was
> described as having a leaf much
> wider in all parts, tips of all lobes were more
> blunt, and was considered
> the species, while the plant now called stenolobum
> was thought to be a
> hybrid of some kind.
> 
> Seems like last year or so someone straightened all
> this out, with the
> magnificently regal narrow leaved plant
> being identified as the species stenolobum, and I
> guess the less attractive
> plant is still williamsii.
> 
> Someone help me with this.   There were some great
> photos of the large
> stenolobum that won a first in the
> Fairchild show, but I couldn't find them at IAS
> site.
> 
> So, based on what I remember, my impression of the
> plant in the photo is
> that it looks more like williamsii than stenolobum.
> 
> Russ
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aroid-l mailing list
> Aroid-l@gizmoworks.com
> http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Aroid-l mailing list
Aroid-l@gizmoworks.com
http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l