Re: RE: OT: ID a Tree & rebloom news
- Subject: Re: [iris-photos] RE: OT: ID a Tree & rebloom news
- From: "David Ferguson" m*@msn.com
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 09:50:25 -0600
- Seal-send-time: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 09:50:25 -0600
Just to be a bit of a rebel here.
'Lady Emma' resides with the old IB's in my beds, where it fits in
quite nicely.
Regardless of registration, I consider 'Lady Emma' to be an IB, but my
definition does not restrict itself to only measurements of stalk and flower,
and I am more concerned with the plants than what the lists say. I don't
remember the chromosome count of 'Lady Emma', but I believe it is of the 44 (or
close) type of ancestry and it's behavior (early flowering, reblooming) and
morphology are not like the older diploid MTB's. It flowers a full month
to even six weeks before the diploid MTB's here. The newer tetraploid
MTB's (different ancestry) may have a similar calendar to 'Lady Emma' (but still
not quite as early), but they are quite different too.
I know that 'Lady Emma' appears in most lists (including the
AIS check list?) as an MTB, and so will continue to appear in sales
lists and shows as an MTB.
I don't have my AIS checklists, the chromosome count, nor the parentage of
'Lady Emma' handy; so, these comments have the uncertainty of being from memory
too.
Please correct me if any of this is wrong.
Dave
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RE: OT: ID a Tree & rebloom news
- From: B* &* L*
- From: B* &* L*
- Re: RE: OT: ID a Tree & rebloom news
- References:
- Re: RE: OT: ID a Tree & rebloom news
- From: t*
- Re: RE: OT: ID a Tree & rebloom news
- From: L* F*
- From: L* F*
- Re: RE: OT: ID a Tree & rebloom news
- Prev by Date: Re: RE: OT: ID a Tree & rebloom news
- Next by Date: Re: TB: Inside Track
- Previous by thread: Re: RE: OT: ID a Tree & rebloom news
- Next by thread: Re: RE: OT: ID a Tree & rebloom news